Author           |
Message |
Fagzilla Got lost in another dimension for a couple months. But seriously, we will actually update the site within the next couple of days. http://www.bandzwiki.com/ Joined: 25 Aug 2008 Posts: 10111 (Thu Aug 20, 2009 6:40 pm) Reply

|
Microsoft can't count |
|
|
1 and 2 = I didn't use computers back then, I dunno lol
3 = Windows 3.x
4 = Windows 95
5 = Windows 98
6 = Windows XP
7 = Windows Vista
8 = Windows 7 (??!?!?)
And that's not including NT, 2000, 98SE, ME, or the Service Pack updates to XP or Vista.
"Windows 7" should be Windows 8 at the bare minimum! |
|
Sporkism It's funny that I have a job executing cats and dogs, considering that I AM A WHORE WHO FUCKS FOR MONEY Joined: 05 Jan 2007 Posts: 5369 (Thu Aug 20, 2009 9:21 pm) Reply

|
Re: Microsoft can't count |
|
|
I miss XP. _________________
@}-,-'- *~*~* Member of the FTU Elegant Tea Party Society *~*~* -'-,-{@ |
|
Fagzilla Got lost in another dimension for a couple months. But seriously, we will actually update the site within the next couple of days. http://www.bandzwiki.com/ Joined: 25 Aug 2008 Posts: 10111 (Thu Aug 20, 2009 9:23 pm) Reply

|
Re: Microsoft can't count |
|
|
I will miss it (most of all) as well. |
|
Big Fagot Alpha ape Joined: 09 Jan 2007 Posts: 10545 (Thu Aug 20, 2009 9:46 pm) Reply

|
Re: Microsoft can't count |
|
|
Jeez, that's troubling, especially with all the additional versions you mentioned which by their exclusion are tacitly categorized as insignificant.
It's almost as though they were only counting major version changes, and two of the consecutive versions you mentioned are similarly not rightly considered distinct.
Whatever the case, you've discovered something impressive which has escaped the rest of the technology industry.
Last edited by Big Fagot on Thu Aug 20, 2009 9:47 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Big Fagot Alpha ape Joined: 09 Jan 2007 Posts: 10545 (Thu Aug 20, 2009 9:46 pm) Reply

|
Re: Microsoft can't count |
|
|
And ... I think that's all we need. |
|
|