Dragon Ball Z Uncensored

Servbot · (Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:04 pm)

Are you sure he's ever been funny?

cloacal kiss · (Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:09 pm)

There have been times when I found him funny!

I guess he's just overworking his gimmick right now. I know it's hard to say he's ever NOT spamming the board, but there are times when the spam at least resembles a retarded attempt at interacting with people. Right now he's just saying the same retarded shit in every thread like a really lazy disinterested Punkasss.

L Ron Butterfly · (Mon Feb 02, 2009 2:01 pm)

(gets compared to outland by cultural imperialist yankees)

(gets accused of saying same thing over and over again by the very people who cannot state an opinion on mathew outland without mentioning me)

L Ron Butterfly · (Mon Feb 02, 2009 2:05 pm)

I'm sorry, but there is honestly no similarity between me and Outland other than the fact that we're both from the South and we both have a relative preoccupation with race when compared to people who live only among their first, second, and third cousins (that is to say, that we're both from the South).

Action Hank · (Mon Feb 02, 2009 2:15 pm)

Similarities are based on verbal garbage ratios.

L Ron Butterfly · (Mon Feb 02, 2009 2:26 pm)

Ace, I know you're really hoping for that to become your first post in two or three years that someone chuckles at, so I can forgive the shallowness, but this really pisses me off.

I am on a noble mission to be the first white person to restate the ideas of Malcolm X in an attempt to make white people look inward on their behavior and culture, which is what has to happen if we are to acheive any form of global unity.

Mathew Outland posts drug-addled rants on how much he hates the South because when white women look at black men sexually, it makes him want to throw up.

And yet, apparently nobody can tell the difference between us.

Mathew Outland demonstrates absolutely no understanding of grammar, punctuation, or syntactical conventions, whereas I can use standard English AND various colloquial dialects. I've had college professors tell me I have a "savant-like" knowlege of grammar. I'm smart enough to realize that SOMEBODY, after reading that sentence, is now trying to think of a snappy joke insulting the Louisiana education system. Intellectual snobs like Big Fagot and Theldorrin even have to admit that my grammar is pretty close to perfect. The only problem I have is the occasional spelling error.

And yet, apparently nobody can tell the difference between us.

I can divert from my usual theme to contribute to a thread. If Mathew Outland ever tries to do this, he is so incompetant at it that you'd think a massive boulder is blocking communication between the right and left hemispheres of his brain.

And yet, apparently nobody can tell the difference between us.

The problem is obviously with you and not me.

Action Hank · (Mon Feb 02, 2009 2:33 pm)

Less to do with what you are saying and more to do with how you say. You an Outland are superficially similar.

You both argue against walls. Those walls being the indifference towards what you are saying (and saying in mass, and in your case with a Hubris-like faux-pretentious flair that is frowned upon making it even more unreadable).

Remember, I am someone who likes you. I just wish you'd stop crusading, seriously or not, in the beautiful quagmire of indifference that is FTU. Or if you do want to crusade for something, at least make it entertaining. We mainly come here to escape ourselves, not to be lectured.

Derek Payne · (Mon Feb 02, 2009 2:37 pm)

I come here to be lectured.

L Ron Butterfly · (Mon Feb 02, 2009 2:39 pm)

While there is a legit argument for comparing me to hubris, it is absolutely ridiculous to compare Outland to him.

Hubris was very intelligent and deliberately made nonsense posts above people's heads and was one of the most interesting posters we've ever had.

Outland doesn't even have a second grade command of the English language. He has YOGURTMAN'S obsession with war generals and can occasionally be mistaken for GIMP MASK in "LOEK HOW MENY DURGZZZZ IM ON!!!!!!!!!!" mode.

However, there is no PUNKASSS and definitely no HUBRISNXS in Outland's persona.

What CRUSADE is Outland on? What is he trying to convince anyone of?

The more you look at this issue, the more you realize it's founded less in reality than in a knee-jerk desire to discredit me, who speaks the truth.

My Head Hurts 90 · (Mon Feb 02, 2009 2:43 pm)

I am on a noble mission to be the first white person to restate the ideas of Malcolm X in an attempt to make white people look inward on their behavior and culture, which is what has to happen if we are to acheive any form of global unity.

L Ron Butterfly · (Mon Feb 02, 2009 2:45 pm)

No, you aren't. You're on a mission to be white and stupid, and hopefully kill yourself after your cheeks lose their rose-tint, and nobody pays attention to you anymore.

My Head Hurts 90 · (Mon Feb 02, 2009 2:48 pm)

I am on a noble mission to be the first white person to restate the ideas of Malcolm X in an attempt to make white people look inward on their behavior and culture, which is what has to happen if we are to acheive any form of global unity.

johnbuisthegreat · (Mon Feb 02, 2009 2:51 pm)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ren%C3%A9_Descartes

Mike Dunn · (Mon Feb 02, 2009 2:51 pm)

Punkasss has to be trolling.

Ryoko's Biatch · (Mon Feb 02, 2009 2:57 pm)

I don't care if he's trolling or not as long as he occasionally says shit like "I am on a noble mission to be the first white person to restate the ideas of Malcolm X in an attempt to make white people look inward on their behavior and culture, which is what has to happen if we are to acheive any form of global unity."

Action Hank · (Mon Feb 02, 2009 3:14 pm)

Theldorrin · (Mon Feb 02, 2009 3:29 pm)

Grammar is nice, but I'd much rather have content.

RPtotheMax · (Mon Feb 02, 2009 3:57 pm)

This thread should never have come into existence.

Action Hank · (Mon Feb 02, 2009 4:03 pm)

Hubris was shitty, and you only see him in a positive light because you were at a more impressionable age when he posted. The guy was a stupid dick who was full of shit. Tried to sell himself as smart by using big words and pretentious posting styles.

Your sad devotion to that ancient posting style has not helped you conjure up the stolen data tapes, or given you clairvoyance enough to find the rebels' hidden fortress...

L Ron Butterfly · (Mon Feb 02, 2009 4:37 pm)

Of course hubris was a piece of shit, but his posting style was hilarious. On the rare occasion he could convince himself that he was not in the middle of an argument with somebody about something, he posted complete nonsense rants about how he somehow managed to gain a measure of social capital by constructing sentences that alternated the order of the words, "pretentious," "dumbfounded," and, "radio."

On every other occasion, he was as belligerant as humanly possible.

He was frighteningly insane (like Utils), and according to Mike Payne, he used to go to school drunk and high and attack him with a chair or a baseball bat or something that you'd expect to see in a professional wrestling match.

I don't know when the word "troll" came to existence, but it's glib and completely unuseful. It works off the incorrect assumption that anybody on this planet is sure enough of their convictions ever to be a hundred percent serious or not serious. It is interesting only as a sociological artifact of Internet culture, and the sooner it becomes archaic, the better.

Can I at least get credit for actually turning this into The hey look Im smarter than outland thread?