Author           |
Message |
kakarot52 Joined: 30 Mar 2012 Posts: 941 (Tue Sep 17, 2013 6:40 pm) Reply
|
Re: GREATEST GENERALS OF ALL TIME |
|
|
Austin is a science experiment to see if you can convince everyone a fascist city is liberal
The experiment was a flaming success _________________ To continue is power -Shitbeast |
|
GimpMask My daddy ate my eyes. Joined: 12 Feb 2007 Posts: 15034 (Tue Sep 17, 2013 8:52 pm) Reply
|
Re: GREATEST GENERALS OF ALL TIME |
|
|
Austin is quite simply the worst place in the world. My brother lives in brooklyn, and he visited Austin and was blown away by the way shit goeson. He said the police make the NYPD look like easy going fellas who are benign pushovers.
To me it is terrible due to the sinful state of their water treatment facilities, with the one reason why Austin should not be a target for annihilation being that they steal fucking water from San Antonio, which is probably the greatest non-media/chemical thing ever. |
|
kakarot52 Joined: 30 Mar 2012 Posts: 941 (Wed Sep 25, 2013 11:45 pm) Reply
|
Re: GREATEST GENERALS OF ALL TIME |
|
|
Austinites are fascist dipshits. Not the worst city I've been too; but it's the worst non-slum/non-ghetto/non-third world etc.
For those who would like to know more about Hannibal
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViOZVomNKno
I'm wondering if Hannibal is an idiot for losing most of this troops crossing the alps; or a genius for using his remaining handful of troop to win 10 or 15 years of decisive victories.
I still wonder if Scipio is better though; not just for winning Zama but also Locri _________________ To continue is power -Shitbeast |
|
GimpMask My daddy ate my eyes. Joined: 12 Feb 2007 Posts: 15034 (Thu Sep 26, 2013 6:12 pm) Reply
|
Re: GREATEST GENERALS OF ALL TIME |
|
|
I vote Gaara.
I really ought to be banned for this post. |
|
kakarot52 Joined: 30 Mar 2012 Posts: 941 (Thu Nov 07, 2013 12:24 am) Reply
|
Re: GREATEST GENERALS OF ALL TIME |
|
|
So, it just occurred to me that Celts were in fact notable blacksmiths who invented chainmail; and that mettalurgy wasn't really a celtic weak point.
In other words, they had a knack for armories yet fought naked in paint because they could. I wonder if there are any great general who fought naked or is that why they lost? Why would anyone fight naked? _________________ To continue is power -Shitbeast |
|
|